“With your experience, diligence, professionalism and personal determination we achieved a successful settlement.“
Mouchel Infrastructure Services
“Brant Associates’ advice was fundamental in bringing about a successful outcome, despite the sheer size and trickery of the opposition.”
G J Heywood FRSA
Heywood Real Estate Limited
“They made the process affordable by keeping things simple and to the point and clearly knew the pro’s and con’s of being in such a situation.”
Structural Steel Fabrications Ltd
“I would have no hesitation in recommending Brant Associates to others and look forward to using them again in the future.”
Partner in the Construction and Engineering Group, DLA Piper UK LLP
“Their approach to resolution of contractual issues and contractual advice has ensured matters are dealt with professionally and efficiently, minimising unnecessary expenditure.”
Galliford Try Partnerships Limited
“I cannot thank nor praise Brant Associates highly enough for guiding me through the minefield of dispute resolution.”
Forward Industrial Products Group Ltd
A Leading Construction Dispute Resolution Consultancy
If you would like a no obligation consultation about any issues you may have, please call
01733 568687. Alternatively e-mail your query to firstname.lastname@example.org
Brant Associates Ltd | Head Office: Unit 8a Opus, Cygnet Park, Hampton, Peterborough, PE7 8HP |
© Brant Associates Ltd 2017
What effect will BIM have on Construction Disputes...??
What is BIM? A type of Software? The 3D model of buildings? A Process linking the client and Design team? An Organised Collection of all Building Data? In truth, BIM is all of these and more.
It is widely thought that Modern day Construction Projects waste up to 30% by reference to cost overruns. These cost over-runs arise due to numerous causes e.g. Poor and/or un-coordinated design and specification, production errors etc. BIM is expected to reduce this by increasing buildability and off site production, together with reducing variations by avoiding clashes due to design errors. BIM will apparently do this by producing timely and accurate construction design, drawings and dimensions as well as the other essential ingredients, e.g. Performance Specification, Employers Requirements, etc... But are you aware of the different levels of BIM?
It is widely reported that the Government Construction Strategy for the UK will require all Public sector work to have adopted BIM by 2016, but were you aware that this is only at Level 2?
The table below details the levels of BIM as set out by the Government Construction Client Group:
So what effect will BIM have on construction Disputes? First we need to think about the common causes of disputes; Poor administration of Construction Contracts, Poor or incomplete design, Variations, Valuation disagreements... To name just a few!
The administration of Contracts is unlikely to be adversely affected by BIM. In fact with the JCT incorporating BIM Protocols into their contracts, will this create another avenue for the ‘Legal Beagles’ to drive down in the form of Design Liability?
Poor or Incomplete Design can lead to Site delays (amongst other issues). BIM through ‘Clash Detection’ should reduce these. A ‘Clash’ being a Design interface issue. Clash detection Pre-BIM occurred naturally within a strong design team, but occasionally (and we’ve all been there) when you get to the construction phase, something may have been missed and the design may require alteration. For example, pre-BIM, if an M&E Sub-Contractor tried to install a pipe and found a beam in the way there could be a delay whilst the Main Contractor sought a solution (a simple example we know, though we trust this makes our point). The theory is that with BIM, this ’Clash’ would be picked up in the 3D modelling and highlighted well in advance of the installation commencing.
Variations, an infinite number of reasons can cause variations on Projects, however using our example above, to re-route the pipe around, above or under the beam would certainly cost more money and hence form a variation. This should/would not need to be a variation under BIM because it should/would have been picked up pre-Construction.
What can BIM do to reduce the arguments that occur with Valuations? Well besides the software being able to assist in the agreement of Measurement, we see little scope for BIM eradicating the Surveyor’s determination to load or slash a valuation to make more profit. In addition it will not prevent the spurious withholding of monies.
The road ahead is a long one, the adoption of BIM sounds like an innovative and progressive step for our Industry but Contractors/Sub-Contractors and Consultancies will need to educate themselves to new ways of working and invest heavily in IT infrastructure, new systems and work procedures. Will the advantage of experience and competence in BIM reduce costs for purchasers of buildings or win more contracts for Contractors or Sub-Contractors and/or increase profitability? Will the benefits prevail over the increased overhead costs?
To answer the question that we pose, BIM has the potential to simplify the resolution of a measurement issue, but it is our intuition that it will not reduce or indeed eradicate Construction Disputes.
|Dispute Resolution for Sub-Contractors|
|Adjudication Support for Sub-Contractors|
|Mediation Support for Sub-Contractors|
|BQ preparation for Sub-Contractors|
|QS Support for Sub-Contractors|
|Interim Valuations for Sub-Contractors|
|Final Account Preparation for Sub-Contractors|
|Delay Analysis for Sub-Contractors|
|Dispute Avoidance Advice for Sub-Contractors|
|Recovery of Retention Monies for Sub-Contractors|
|Check tenders / system Implementation for Sub-Contractors|
|EOT preparation for Sub-Contractors|
|Dispute Resolution Services for Contractors|
|Adjudication Support for Contractors|
|Mediation Support for Contractors|
|Bill Preparation for Contractors|
|QS Support for Contractors|
|Interim Valuations for Contractors|
|Final Account Preparation for Contractors|
|Delay Analysis for Contractors|
|Dispute Avoidance Advice for Contractors|
|Retention Recovery for Contractors|
|Systems Implementation for Contractors|
|EOT Preparation for Contractors|
|Expert Witness Services for Solicitors|
|Delay Analysis for Solicitors|
|Adjudication Support for Solicitors|
|Mediation Support for Solicitors|
|QS Support for Solicitor's Clients|
|Final Account Preparation for Solicitors|
|Interim Account Valuations for Solicitors|
|EOT Preparation for Solictiors|
|Review Development Costs|
|Expert Witness Services|
|Standard Support Contract|
|Advanced Support Contract|
|Recent Clients - Sub-Contractors|
|Recent Clients - Contractors|
|Recent Clients - Lawyers|
|Recent Clients - Other|
|Article - Does Anyone Really 'Plan to fail'|
|Article - Why Failing to Plan is Planning to Fail|
|Article - What effect will BIM have on Construction Disputes?|
|Article - Is Adjudication Too Expensive?|
|Article - The “Prevention Principle” is Alive and Kicking|
|Article - Wax on, Wax off|
|Article - Disputes to become more complex?|
|Article - Late or non-payment problems|
|Article - When is a ‘Slip’ Not a ‘Slip’|
|Article - Tackling Legal Disputes – The Wembley Experience|
|Article - Letters of Intent and Quantum Meruit – Easy Street or Skid Row?|